Equity-sleeve coverage100.0%99.7% covered of 99.7% retained equity weight.
Total-fund coverage99.7%Company fundamentals as a share of 100.0% reported fund weight; no reallocation.
Non-company exposure0.3%Cash, derivatives, and other non-equity rows are excluded · tradingview_etf_holdings · Jul 17, 2026 · current.
Complete mapped company sleeve50/50 mapped companies have stored fundamentals, covering 100.0% of the retained company sleeve and 99.7% of fund weight. The remaining 0.3% is non-company exposure, not missing companies.
2837 — Global X Japan Mid & Small Cap Leaders ETF factor map
Return factors and risk factors built from stored company fundamentals, price tape, themes, event evidence, liquidity, and flow datasets.
Companies50Ranked inside this universe
Factors5034 ready · 16 partial
Coverage97%Average ready-factor coverage
As ofJul 21, 8:00 AM GMT+8Latest stored factor input
Full factor lab detail queuedThe initial factor map is loaded from the compact snapshot; full histories, heatmaps, validation matrices, and lenses hydrate on demand.
Factor workflow
Navigate the factor engine without scrolling the whole report
Start with attribution quality, move into the action book, then inspect individual factor evidence only when needed.
Factor exposure engine
Explain 2837 — Global X Japan Mid & Small Cap Leaders ETF through true factor returns
Daily stock-level cross-sectional regressions estimate factor returns from company returns and reusable economic factor exposures. Sector, industry, theme, and country are reporting lenses, not dummy factors used to force-fit the universe return.
For each stored trading day, company returns are regressed against reusable company-level factor exposures. The common market column captures the broad universe tape; style factors explain tilts around that tape.
Lens policyNo fake fit from buckets
Sector, industry, country, and theme are reporting lenses only; they are not dummy variables used to force-fit returns.
Attribution splitWhat is investable versus only explanatory
21 usable factors · 26 diagnostic factors
Common tape+32.08%Broad universe move before active factor interpretation.Rewarded / usable factors+6.28%17 rewarded · 4 risk-controlDiagnostic factors+7.30%26 diagnostic · 0 blockedResidual-0.09%Idiosyncratic return that should flow into company-level research.
Attribution policy. Separate common tape, investable rewarded factors, diagnostic factors, and residual. Diagnostic factors explain movement but are not portfolio-sizing inputs.
Factor action bookWhat to overweight, hedge, block, or research next
Overweight · +5.57% actionable return
Active tilts17Risk controls4Blocked0Research-only26Regime-adjusted17
Small / validation pendingConviction 65 · risk budget n/a%
Contribution
+0.54%
Factor return
+3.40%
Exposure
+0.16
Reshoring supply-chain is a rewarded factor with positive contribution and usable breadth.
Regime-aware sizingSmall / validation pending
No stored regime evidence · best n/a · worst n/a · n/a% survival
No stored regime validation yet; keep sizing small until regime behavior is refreshed.
Coverage passValidation watchPayoff passCrowding failRisk budget watchRegime fit watch
Use the action book as a review order. Active tilts require validation, breadth, uniqueness, controlled crowding, and regime survival; diagnostic rows remain research-only.
Model fit disciplineWhen factor attribution is reliable enough to use
Usable factor fit
Current stock-level fit94%Weighted R-squared across latest company returns.Average daily fit66%How often the model explains day-to-day cross-sectional moves.Fit stability72%Share of stored sessions with usable stock-level factor fit.Residual cost+6.59%Average stock-level error; gross residual +3.65%.
Not an accounting identity. R-squared is a stock-level fit diagnostic, not a promise that factors explain every portfolio return dollar. The residual board remains the source of company-specific work.
Use factors for the common tape and major style tilts; send weak-fit pockets into residual research.
Factor trust dashboardCan this attribution guide positioning?
Usable with checks
Trust score72
Use smaller factor tilts; validate residual clusters and crowded factors before sizing.
Positioning guidanceUsable with checks
Use smaller factor tilts; validate residual clusters and crowded factors before sizing.
Weakest fit dayJun 22, 2026
32% fit · RMSE +1.01%
Residual-dominated days10
Latest fit 99% · average 66%
Required checks before sizing3 passed
Stock-level fitpass66 · Latest and average stock-level fit are strong enough to start with factor attribution.
Residual loadpass10 · Residual sleeve is controlled enough for a factor-first review.
Validation depthwatchn/a · Run forward validation before treating factor payoffs as durable.
Crowding controlfail100 · Top factors or redundant factors dominate; cap position size and avoid double counting.
Diagnostic factor loadpass16 · Most model risk comes from usable rewarded or risk-control factors.
Failure modes4 checks
Weakest fit dayhigh2026-06-22 had only 32.0% stock-level explanatory fit.
Validation depthmediumForward validation is not strong enough to treat every factor payoff as durable.
Crowding controlhighA small number of sleeves or overlapping factors can dominate the attribution.
Residual-dominated daysmedium10 stored sessions had more residual than modeled factor fit.
Factor reliability boardWhich factors are investable, confirming, or noisy
55 average reliability · 0 decision-grade factors
Decision-grade tilts0Validated enough for active factor interpretation
No factor clears all reliability gates yet.
Usable confirmation2Useful when independent evidence agrees
ValueUse as a confirming factor alongside other independent evidence.
Reliability
69
Validation
n/a
Crowding
67
Growth accelerationUse as a confirming factor alongside other independent evidence.
Reliability
59
Validation
n/a
Crowding
36
Noisy or incomplete4Needs better validation, coverage, or stability
Industrial-policy beneficiaryUse as a descriptive exposure until forward tests are populated.
Reliability
55
Validation
n/a
Crowding
69
QualityUse as a descriptive exposure until forward tests are populated.
Reliability
54
Validation
n/a
Crowding
76
Shareholder yieldUse as a descriptive exposure until forward tests are populated.
Reliability
54
Validation
n/a
Crowding
77
AI infrastructure intensityUse as a descriptive exposure until forward tests are populated.
Reshoring supply-chainUse only as a warning or confirmation; avoid double-counting this factor.
Reliability
61
Validation
n/a
Crowding
99
Fiscal spending betaUse only as a warning or confirmation; avoid double-counting this factor.
Reliability
62
Validation
n/a
Crowding
99
Price momentumUse only as a warning or confirmation; avoid double-counting this factor.
Reliability
59
Validation
n/a
Crowding
98
Fund-flow confirmationUse only as a warning or confirmation; avoid double-counting this factor.
Reliability
63
Validation
n/a
Crowding
98
No factor currently clears the decision-grade validation, stability, and uniqueness gates.Some factors are highly correlated with peers, so do not add their attributions together mechanically.Some factors are descriptive only until forward validation or coverage improves.
Tracker